Libya against the world

In Libya, the riots that arose several months ago in search of a democratic system have resulted in a conflict that can almost classify civil war. The dictator Qaddafi, far from giving up power in response to requests of his people has clung on using force against the protesters. After such unfortunate events the UN decided it was time to take action, creating what they call "no-fly zone" in banning all flights except those carrying humanitarian aid, allowing countries to take voluntary out the mission of any military action unless the occupation of the territory.


That is, we can summarize that the threat of civil war in Libya, the United Nations prefer a quick resolution allowing other countries involved in the conflict. At the risk of being unpopular, when a country breaks the beginning of a civil war, no other nation should act freely, must be a pressure lobby, which has provision to engage the people, and weaken the oppressor, without sending troops but other matters that need more people trying to use their power to prevent dictators are sustained and eventually have to give.


We have created the mistaken idea of ​​conflict of 20 or 30 days, when in fact, often take several months or even years, as always remain traces of one side or another, who thought they were defeated by the foreign invader and not by his enemy, and can prolong the conflict heretofore unknown.


Some might say that the rebels have no civil Libyans or strategic weapons capability to deal with the regime, and perhaps they are right, there should appear lobby pressure, supplying arms and mercenaries aupen to the people to victory. Let us be honest and let's be honest, modern wars do not exist and will always be the same, and the best way to intervene is pressed, no exercising authoritarian power within international framework to make it known that we are the most powerful and the most righteous.



* DC Think Tank